Diciembre 2024

Things will have to change? Analysing the Spanish transition to democracy from an elite perspective

Abstract. Authoritarian elites may play an essential role in transitioning democracies, but little is known about the fate of these elites beyond that of the top leaders. This article offers the first panel-data study of authoritarian elites in a transitional democracy. We focus on Spain, a paradigmatic case of successful democratization from above, and rely on an original dataset...

Explaining Change in Citizens’ Preferences About Intergovernmental Responsibilities During the COVID-19 Crisis: The Case of Spain

Abstract. The COVID-19 pandemic brought about some extraordinary shifts in citizens’ preferences about intergovernmental responsibilities in several federal states and has therefore provided an especially interesting context to contribute to the ongoing debate about the scope, direction, and determinants of attitudinal change in citizens’ preferences in situations of protracted crisis. Although...

Noviembre 2024

Fragmentación y polarización parlamentaria en España: la evolución en el Congreso y autonomías (1979-2022)

Resumen. La fragmentación y la polarización en el sistema parlamentario español se habían analizado hasta ahora con limitaciones temporales o territoriales. En este trabajo, se exponen los niveles de fragmentación y polarización ideológica en el Congreso de los Diputados y en las cámaras de las 17 comunidades autónomas desde 1979 a 2022. Los hallazgos permiten identificar qué cámaras están más...

Octubre 2024

Memory bias beyond ego: Selective recall of positive financial outcomes

Abstract. A recent experimental literature has documented that people are (sometimes) asymmetric updaters: good news is over-weighted relative to bad news. This phenomenon might be due to selective recall (SR), whereby people better recall positive evidence than negative evidence. To test this hypothesis, we ran a balls-and-urns experiment where each subject faced a box with 100 balls, each...

Disagreeing to Agree: Populism and Consensus Among Members of Parliaments and Their Voters

Abstract. Populism is theoretically associated with an antagonistic interpretation of politics. Populists tend to morally delegitimize their adversaries, exhibit “bad manners” toward them, and sometimes even try to exclude them from “the people.” They are also more inclined to prioritize radical policy and institutional changes. Therefore, populism appears to be directly at odds with consensus...

Errors of measurement in scientometrics: classification schemes and document types in citation and publication rankings

Abstract. This research article delves into methodological challenges in scientometrics, focusing on errors stemming from the selection of classification schemes and document types. Employing two case studies, we examine the impact of these methodological choices on publication and citation rankings of institutions. We compute seven bibliometric indicators for over 8434 institutions using 23...

Septiembre 2024

Institutional Factors and Agreement in Lawmaking. American Behavioral Scientist

Abstract. Contemporary democracies are undergoing a period of rising levels of polarization and fragmentation. At the same time, the degree of conflict in several parliaments, particularly in Europe, has significantly increased. Despite this, we know very little about conflict and consensus-building in parliaments. In this article, we analyze the degree of agreement in...

The effect of scientific impact on science communication through art from the lens of deviance theories. Journal of Communication Science

Abstract. Exploring the multifaceted relationship between scientific impact and science communication through art, our study surveys 2,500 Spanish artistic researchers. Guided by deviance theories and double standards theories we reveal a nuanced pattern: the effect of scientific impact initially impedes science communication through art, turning positive after a given...

Agosto 2024

Teacher Bias in Assessments by Student Ascribed Status: A Factorial Experiment on Discrimination in Education. Sociological Science

Abstract. Teachers are the evaluators of academic merit. Identifying if their assessments are fair or biased by student-ascribed status is critical for equal opportunity but empirically challenging, with mixed previous findings. We test status characteristics beliefs, statistical discrimination, and cultural capital theories with a pre-registered factorial experiment on a large sample of Spanish...

Julio 2024

Immigrant regularisation politics during COVID-19: advocacy coalitions and governments’ incentives in Italy and Spain. South European Society and Politics

Abstract. The COVID-19 pandemic brought the issue of immigrant irregularity to the public fore, exposing undocumented migrants’ vulnerabilities and the reliance of supply chains on their ‘essential work’. While pro-regularisation instances emerged in several countries, governments responded differently to them. Delving into the political determinants of immigrant...